Monday, November 10, 2008

101 Ways Obama is Wrong. #2


Obama Zombies Believed It --Smart People Don't
What caused our current economic crisis? If you are an Obama Zombie, your answer, (all together now) is "Bush's failed economic policies." Of course, you have no idea what that means because you were only taught the mantra, not the realities.

The economic crisis came because of liberal government. Period. Pressure was brought to bear on banks to lend money to people who couldn't pay it back. "Prime" lending rates get that label because they are the reduced rates that banks offer only to their best customers. "Sub-Prime" is below that. Now, banks would not lend money that cheap unless they could make it back.

Here's how the scheme worked: The liberals in government pressured banks to make housing loans to people who couldn't pay back, thinking it was the right thing to do to help the poor buy houses. As good as those intentions might be, it was foolish. The banks then were promised that someone would buy those bad loans from them. Who would do that? Government backed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. These institutions that Barney Frank said were "in no danger" and which Bush and McCain said, needed to be controlled. The banks, greedy for the money, gave into the pressure, sold the loans till freddie and fannie ran out of money. Then the tax payers had to step in (for the record, No More Bailouts! there's been too many already).

That's where our crisis comes from. What to the Obama Zombies say it comes from? "Bush tax cuts to the wealthy!" Of course, libs don't do real economics --only theoretical economics that work in socialist classrooms, so these silly explanations are all they offer. And the Bush haters (there are many) are ready to take that answer and leave it at that.

What does this mean will happen when Barak solves the problems by raising taxes on the rich and our government continues the stupidity of bailing out banks? More disaster. But those details will have to wait for another post...

For a good summary of the sub-prime mess, click here.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

101 Reasons Why Obama Is Wrong, #1

Obama is wrong about the value of human life.


The exact words, "if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."
I'm glad I'm not his daughters having to learn morals and values from such a defective moral teacher.

First, he says, when they make a mistake. If his daughter is pregnant, it is not a mistake. It is a choice to have sex. He is teaching them that it is not their responsibility to handle what they did. Instead, they can abort.

Second, he refers to a baby as "punishment." The Bible says that children are a gift from the Lord. Who is right? The Bible or Barry? I choose the Bible, for God never lies. No matter how it is conceived, a baby is a gift from God. Not a punishment.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Because He is Delightful: Walter E Williams


The following is a column that can be found here, along with others by the same author.

For the U.S. Congress, news media, pundits and much of the American public, a lot of economic phenomena can be explained by what people want, human greed and what seems plausible. I'm going to name this branch of economic "science" wackonomics and apply it to some of today's observations and issues.
Since July this year, crude oil prices have fallen from $147 to $64 a barrel. Similarly, average gasoline prices have fallen from over $4 to a national average of $2.69 a gallon. When crude oil and gasoline were reaching their historical highs, Congress and other wackoeconomists blamed it on greedy oil company CEOs in their lust for obscene profits. But what explains today's lower prices? The only answer, consistent with wackonomic theory, is easy: Oil company CEOs have lost their lust for obscene profits. Or, maybe, since many of these CEOs are getting up in years, they might have begun to heed Matthew's warning (19:24), "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."
Speaking of CEOs, there's the "unconscionable," "obscene" salaries they receive, in some cases over $10 million a year. Wackonomics has an easy answer for these high salaries: it's greed. However, CEOs don't have the corner on greed. There are other greedy people we don't scorn but hold in high esteem. According to Forbes' Celebrity 100 list, Oprah Winfrey receives $275 million, Steven Spielberg gets $130 million, Tiger Woods $115 million, Jay Leno $32 million and Dr. Phil $40 million. I need to talk to these people and learn their strategy. I've been making every effort to get that kind of money. I go to bed greedy, dream greedy dreams, awaken greedy and proceed through the day greedy. Despite my heroic efforts, it's all been for naught; I earn a pittance by comparison.
Wackonomics can help us understand what some people call the income distribution. The logical extension of wackonomic thought is that the unequal or unfair distribution of income is the handiwork of a dollar dealer who distributes dollars. The dollar dealer might deal one person a million dollars a year while dealing most others a mere pittance like $10, $20 or $30 thousand a year. Thus, the reason why some people are wealthy while others are poor is because the dollar dealer is a racist, sexist, a multi-nationalist, or just plain mean. Economic justice requires a re-dealing of the dollars, income redistribution or spreading the wealth, where the government takes the ill-gotten gains of the few and returns them to their rightful owners. Wackonomics might have a greed-based explanation for income inequality. There is a pile of money called income and greedy people got there first and took their unfair share. Similarly, economic justice requires a redistribution of income.
Wackonomics isn't just practiced by the uninitiated. This year's Nobel Laureate, Princeton University Professor Paul Krugman, after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, gave one rendition of wackonomics in his column "After the Horror," New York Times (9/14/01). Krugman wrote, "Ghastly as it may seem to say this, the terror attack -- like the original day of infamy, which brought an end to the Great Depression -- could do some economic good." He went on to point out how rebuilding the destruction in New York and Washington, D. C., would stimulate the economy through business investment and job creation. For practitioners of non-wackonomics, this reasoning doesn't even pass the smell test. If Professor Krugman's vision is correct, and extending his logic, the terrorists would have made an even larger contribution to our economic well-being had they been able to fly a plane into the White House and destroyed buildings in other cities.
Wackonomics isn't all bad. There's an upside to it. It spares people the bother of having to understand the complexities of the world.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. --Thomas Jefferson


McCain says we all need to get behind our president now. Wrong. I am behind my country and its constitution. So I am stuck with this man as president, but I oppose him, for he opposes our constitution as far as I am concerned.

He is wrong on the economy (wants to raise taxes, redistribute wealth, nationalize healthcare, and spend another trillion dollars and continue to increase the government hog). These policies will make the recent "crisis" in the stock market look like Christmas by comparison.

He is wrong on energy. He wants to, in his words, bankrupt any who try to build coal burning electric power plants. He will not drill for our own energy. He is for subsidizing ethanol which will continue to inflate the price of food all over the world (leading to more hardship for the poor) and will produce a gas product that gets poor mileage. He will see us weaker economically and weaker worldwide because of this.

He is wrong on foreign affairs. He is pro-plo, anti-Israel as he has shown and will show. His desire to be friends with the dictators of the world will backfire on him. He wants to slash military spending (as he said) and this will make us weaker. He wants to undo all our progress in the middle east,etc.

He is wrong on life. He is willing to kill the unborn and even the born without remorse, as is shown by his record.

He is wrong on the constitution, wanting judges that will help him redistribute wealth which is(pay attention second-grade level civics students, aka Obama voters) socialism and it has failed every where it has been tried (capitalism and free market have been our approach for . . . 300 years, and we are the wealthiest nation on the planet --facts are facts).

As far as I am concerned, Obama is a nice man, but not an American in ideology and he needs to be opposed at every step. I shall do this as much as it lays in my power.

Americans seem to have a sheep-like quality these days. They would trade their freedoms for the promise of comfort and safety. We were in this same position in 1776. I have the same response to the oppressors now as I did then, "I know not what course other men may take, but as for me, give me freedom (liberty) or give me death."

Obama, you are still an empty suit and a meager little snipe. Sorry, you can't be my messiah and can never take away the true freedom within me.

From this day forward, the Fading Fringe Blog will be subversive to the powers that be, and hopelessly American. Watch and see . . .

Monday, November 3, 2008

Back When Presidential Candidates Were Also Americans

* You cannot help the poor, by destroying the rich.
* You cannot strengthen the weak, by weakening the strong.
* You cannot bring about prosperity, by discouraging thrift.
* You cannot lift the wage earner up, by pulling the wage payer down.
* You cannot further the brotherhood of man, by inciting class hatred.
* You cannot build character and courage, by taking away men's initiative
and independence.
* You cannot help men permanently, by doing for them what they could and
should, do for themselves."

- Abraham Lincoln

Not Fringe Enough



Although it is way too "non-political" and "non-fading fringe" to do so more often than once a year, I suppose the state of PA and all my homeys from the state do deserve some love. I remember the last time the Phillies won the series --I was a senior in high school. Some people say that was a long time ago, but it seems like yesterday. I remember Kruk's team. How could you not like those guys? They fell short. Hats off to the 2008 Phils.

And, don't forget those Lions. (Pray for them if you will. Three more wins and a little luck and they have a shot at all the marbles).

Now, back to our regularly scheduled programs...